Home Page   |   Site Map   |   Contact
Path :  www.lphg.ch Ph.D. { Web Version } Chapter 4 4.3 4.3.3
Previous  |  Next
CV
Table of Contents
{ Abstract / Résumé }
Chapter 1
Chapter 2
Chapter 3
4.1
{ 4.2 }
4.3.1 : Time multiplexing OLCR design
4.3.2 : Measurement principle
Ph.D.  /  { Web Version }  /  Chapter 4  /  4.3  /  4.3.3 : Balanced detection scheme
MBI
Physics Diploma
Photos
Post-Doc
Chapter 5
Chapter 6
Chapter 7
Chapter 8
Appendix
Other parts
{ 4.4 }
{ 4.5 }
4.6
4.7
4.3.4 : Polarization effects
4.3.5 : Wavelength multiplexing OLCR design
4.3.6 : Discussion on the different OLCR designs
4.3.7 : Time multiplexing design in OFDR use
4.3.8 : Transmission impulse response OLCR set-up

4.3        New OLCR set-ups

4.3.3       Balanced detection scheme

Fig. 4-9 OLCR set-up with balanced detection

The interference signals (AC) are very small compared to the constant part (DC) and amplitudes between -50 to -120 dB are expected for FBGs. Electronic filtering of the DC signal is not optimal as it adds a lot of noise that reduces the S/N. A balanced detection scheme is then preferred where the DC signal is differentially cancelled. Moreover, the balanced detection scheme within our set-ups (Fig. 4-9) not only suppresses the DC part but doubles the AC part at the same time. In order to discuss such point, Fig. 4-9 presents the principal parts of an OLCR set-up where the reference system has been omitted. A circulator is placed in the source arm and the returning signal in this arm is then redirected to the detector. An attenuator is used on the other arm to compensate the insertion loss of the circulator.

This balanced detection scheme is based on the properties of the coupler. For an input signal of amplitude E, the outgoing symmetric Es and anti-symmetric Ea signals (Fig. 4-10a) exhibit a phase difference of p/2 for the same OPLD [4-10].

Fig. 4-10 Fiber coupler principle (a) and electric fields pertinent for balanced detection (b)

Considering the reference signal Er and test signals Et (Fig. 4-10b), the total signals in the source arm Es and in the detection arm Ed are given by



(4-42)


where j1,2 is a phase dependent factor that contains the propagation in the source and detection arm respectively. The corresponding intensities are



(4-43)


We observe that the DC intensity is identical but that the AC intensity part has a p phase factor difference. This means that when Is shows a constructive interference, Id shows a destructive interference. The intensity difference is obtained by using the relation eip = -1


(4-44)


For a given mirror position, the difference intensity Idiff is the real part of the AC interference signal that would be obtained directly with Er and Et for a mirror l/4 away from its current position. Experimentally, this means that the effective mirror position has a constant l/4 offset.

As it concerns this detection, another point must be discuss. The S/N is strongly related to the detector noise that depends on the total optical power of the incoming light [4-11]. In our set-ups, the total light power is reduced in the reference arm by the in- and out-coupling (-50 dB at least) and in the test arm by the FBG itself, allowing by this lower detector noise. Moreover, the chosen balanced detection scheme improves the S/N [4-12]. The observed noise limit in our measurements is about -120 dB for FBGs. This level corresponds to the Rayleigh backscattering in telecom fibers [4-13]. Experiments conducted on cleaved fibers as sample have shown lower S/N several centimeters after the fiber end position around -140 dB.



Top   |   JavaScript
Path :  www.lphg.ch Ph.D. { Web Version } Chapter 4 4.3 4.3.3
Previous  |  Next