Fig. 4-9 OLCR set-up with balanced detection
The interference signals (AC) are very small
compared to the constant part (DC) and amplitudes between -50 to -120 dB are
expected for FBGs. Electronic filtering of the DC signal is not optimal as it
adds a lot of noise that reduces the S/N. A balanced detection scheme is then
preferred where the DC signal is differentially cancelled. Moreover, the
balanced detection scheme within our set-ups (Fig. 4-9) not only
suppresses the DC part but doubles the AC part at the same time. In order to
discuss such point, Fig. 4-9 presents the principal parts of an OLCR
set-up where the reference system has been omitted. A circulator is placed in
the source arm and the returning signal in this arm is then redirected to the
detector. An attenuator is used on the other arm to compensate the insertion
loss of the circulator.
This balanced detection scheme is based
on the properties of the coupler. For an input signal of amplitude E, the
outgoing symmetric Es and anti-symmetric Ea signals (Fig.
4-10a) exhibit a phase difference of p/2 for the same OPLD [4-10].
Fig. 4-10 Fiber coupler principle (a) and electric fields pertinent for
balanced detection (b)
Considering the reference signal Er
and test signals Et (Fig. 4-10b), the total signals in the
source arm Es and in the detection arm Ed are given by

|
(4-42) |
where j1,2 is a phase dependent factor that contains the propagation in the
source and detection arm respectively. The corresponding intensities are

|
(4-43) |
We observe that the DC intensity is
identical but that the AC intensity part has a p phase factor difference.
This means that when Is shows a constructive interference, Id
shows a destructive interference. The intensity difference is obtained by using
the relation eip = -1
|
(4-44) |
For a given mirror position, the
difference intensity Idiff is the real part of the AC interference
signal that would be obtained directly with Er and Et for
a mirror l/4 away from its current position. Experimentally, this means that
the effective mirror position has a constant l/4 offset.
As it concerns this detection, another
point must be discuss. The S/N is strongly related to the detector noise that
depends on the total optical power of the incoming light [4-11]. In our
set-ups, the total light power is reduced in the reference arm by the in- and
out-coupling (-50 dB at least) and in the test arm by the FBG itself,
allowing by this lower detector noise. Moreover, the chosen balanced detection
scheme improves the S/N [4-12]. The observed noise limit in our
measurements is about -120 dB for FBGs. This level corresponds to the Rayleigh
backscattering in telecom fibers [4-13]. Experiments conducted on cleaved
fibers as sample have shown lower S/N several centimeters after the fiber end
position around -140 dB.
|