 |
6.2
Relative Humidity Sensor
Using Optical Fiber Bragg Gratings
This section presents the paper that has
been published in Optics Letters, 27 (16), p. 1385-7. The authors are :
-
Pascal Kronenberg, Pramod K.
Rastogi : Institute of Structural Engineering and Mechanics, Swiss Federal
Institute of Technology
-
Philippe Giaccari, Hans G.
Limberger : Institute of Applied Optics, Swiss Federal Institute of
Technology
This paper presents a novel concept for
an intrinsic relative humidity sensor using polyimide-recoated fiber Bragg
gratings. Tests in a controlled environment indicate that the sensor has a
linear, reversible and accurate response behavior between 10 and 90 %RH and
between 13 and 60 °C. The relative humidity and temperature sensitivities were
measured as a function of the coating thickness and the thermal and hygroscopic
expansion coefficients of the polyimide coating were determined.
Numerous applications such as chemical
processing, air conditioning, agriculture, food storage and civil engineering
require humidity sensing. Several researchers have reported on the measurement
of relative humidity in air using optical fiber sensors, which are particularly
valued for their performance in harsh environments [1]. Optical sensing techniques proposed so far include extrinsic
interferometric [2, 3] and
spectroscopic [4] point sensors, as well as
intrinsic evanescent-field [5] and
microbend loss based [6] distributed
sensors. Recently we presented a study on the influence of relative humidity
and temperature on a commercial polyimide-recoated fiber Bragg grating [7].
Here we explore a novel concept for an intrinsic relative humidity point sensor
using polyimide-recoated fiber Bragg gratings. We describe the steady state relative
humidity and temperature response of the sensor as a function of the fiber
coating thickness, which also allows us to determine the thermal and
hygroscopic expansion coefficients of the polyimide.
Fiber Bragg grating sensors have been a
topic of sizeable research efforts in recent years [8]. A fiber Bragg grating
is a permanent, periodically index-changing structure written into the core of
an optical fiber. Fiber Bragg gratings are attractive sensing elements since
they feature a response that is reversible, accurate and stable over long time
periods, can be used for absolute measurements and can be readily applied to
in-line multiplexed sensor chains. The latter makes it possible to set up
multi-point and multi-parameter (e.g. strain, temperature) single-fiber
sensors.
Bare silica fibers are not sensitive to
humidity. Polyimide polymers, however, are hygroscopic and swell in aqueous
media as the water molecules migrate into them. Analogous to the hair in a
mechanical hair hygrometer, the swelling of the polyimide coating induces
strain in the fiber, which modifies the Bragg condition of the fiber Bragg
grating and thus serves as the basis of the proposed sensor.
We have already shown that the response
behavior of a polyimide-recoated fiber Bragg grating is a linear superposition
of relative humidity and temperature effects [7]. In the presence of a
variation in humidity and temperature, the relative Bragg wavelength shift,
Δλ/λ, for relative humidity, ΔRH, and temperature changes,
ΔT, is therefore given by
where SRH and ST are
the sensor sensitivities to relative humidity and temperature, respectively.
To relate the sensitivities to material
properties, SRH and ST may be expressed as the sum of a
mechanical, a strain- and, for ST only, a thermo-optic contribution:
|
(2) |
and
|
(3) |
where, βcf and βf
are the hygroscopic expansion coefficients of the coated and the bare fiber -
which is zero -, respectively; αcf and αf are
the thermal expansion coefficients of the coated and the bare fiber,
respectively.
= neff2 (p12 + eel,r / eel,z (p11 + p12)) / 2
is the effective photo-elastic constant of the coated fiber, where neff
is the effective refractive index of the fiber, pij are the Pockel's
(piezo) coefficients of the strain-optic tensor, and eel,r and eel,z are the radial and axial elastic
strains of the coated fiber, respectively. ξ is the thermo-optic
coefficient of the fiber core.
The mechanical behavior of the coated
fiber is modeled with an infinitely long, bi-material composite rod wherein the
two materials cohere perfectly. As both materials exhibit different relative
humidity and temperature sensitivities, the humidity- and temperature-induced
constrained expansion exerts strain on the fiber. Assuming a one-dimensional
(1-D), purely axial model, the equilibrium and compatibility conditions are sfAf + scAc = 0
and ef = ec, respectively, where, si is the
axial stress; Ai is the cross-section area; and ei is the total, i.e. elastic and thermal / hygroscopic, axial strain
of the fiber (i = f) and of the coating (i = c). With the deformation obeying an
elastic, Hookean law, the hygroscopic and thermal expansion coefficients of the
coated fiber are the sums of the stiffness weighted expansion coefficients of
the bare fiber and of the coating, βcf = kfβf + kcβc
and αcf = kfαf + kcαc,
respectively. βc and αc are the hygroscopic and
thermal expansion coefficients of the coating, ki = EiAi / SEjAj
is the stiffness proportion of the silica fiber and of the polyimide coating
(i, j = f, c) with Ef and Ec being the moduli of silica
and polyimide, respectively. Regarding
, we
notice that, using the 1-D model, eel,r is set
to zero (no radial strain). For a more realistic simulation of the mechanical
behavior of the fiber, which also takes into account both radial and tangential
effects, a 3-D finite element model was employed.
Fig. 1.
Experimental setup.
The sensor response to relative
humidity and temperature was experimentally measured in a computer controlled
climatic chamber. An array of eight fiber Bragg gratings written in SMF 28 type
fiber with different Bragg wavelengths in the 1550 nm band were spliced
together and integrated into a fiber Bragg grating measurement setup (Fig. 1).
The reflected spectrum was demodulated using a fiber Fabry-Perot tunable
filter. For reference monitoring, an industry standards-compliant, combined
resistive temperature (RTD) and capacitive relative humidity gauge from
Rotronic was placed next to the gratings. A computer acquired the read out from
the fiber Bragg grating interrogation system (FBG-IS) and from the reference gauge.
In order to quantify the influence of
the coating thickness on the sensor sensitivity, one bare grating (FBG 1) and
seven gratings with different average coating thicknesses of 3.6 (FBG 2), 6.6
(FBG 3), 11.8 (FBG 4), 18.7 (FBG 5), 21.3 (FBG 6), 27.3 (FBG 7) and 29.3 mm (FBG 8),
respectively, were installed into the measurement system. The coating
thickness, measured by microscope, exhibits an uncertainty of ± 1 mm due to non-homogeneity. All gratings were fabricated in-house and,
with exception of FBG 1, mold-coated in a Vytran UV-recoater. The polyimide
used for coating was obtained from HD MicroSystems (Pyralin®) and
contains a UV-curable component, which is employed to transform the liquid
polymer into a soft gel state before proceeding with the heat cure. The coating
procedure had to be repeated several times to obtain thicker coatings.
For tests related to sensor
characterization and calibration, the climatic chamber was set to maintain a
constant temperature during relative humidity cycles. The relative humidity was
incrementally raised from 10 to 90 %RH, and then lowered back down to 10 %RH,
for five different temperatures between 13 and 60 °C. The highest temperature
is limited by the maximum operating range of the electrical gauge. Yet additional
tests have shown that the sensor is not damaged by being exposed to
temperatures ranging from -20 up to 160 °C. For each relative humidity and
temperature combination, measurements were taken in 1-minute intervals for two
hours to make sure that the water content within the polyimide reaches an
equilibrium state. As a rule, the Bragg wavelength shift saturates after a few
minutes [7]. The changes in environmental conditions in the climatic chamber
were monitored using the gauge, simultaneously with the recording of signals
returned from each fiber Bragg grating.
Figure 2 shows the relative Bragg
wavelength shift of FBG 8 as a function of relative humidity (steady state
average values) for different temperatures. An increase in relative humidity or
temperature shifts the Bragg wavelength to higher values. Experimental data are
found to vary linearly with relative humidity and temperature changes, as
assumed in the model described in eq. (1), confirming a linear relationship
between relative humidity and polyimide expansion. A two-dimensional linear
regression of the temperature and relative humidity data leads to temperature
and relative humidity sensitivities of ST = (7.79 ± 0.08)·10-6 K-1 and SRH = (2.21 ± 0.10)·10-6 %RH-1, respectively. The errors
result from measurement uncertainties. Applying a quadratic regression, the
quadratic and mixed terms are smaller than the uncertainties, which
demonstrates that the material properties are not significantly influenced over
the tested temperature range, neither by temperature nor by relative humidity.
Fig. 2.
Relative Bragg wavelength shift of FBG 8 as a function of relative
humidity for different temperatures (zero relative Bragg wavelength shift
arbitrary chosen).
The influence of relative humidity on
the swelling of the polyimide is reversible, as the Bragg wavelength is the
same at the beginning and at the end of a relative humidity cycle at constant
temperature. Experiments have also shown a non-reversible component for
temperatures exceeding values previously experienced. This may be due to a
final thermal curing process needed for the polyimide to stabilize, and can be
by-passed with an initial burn-in cycle.
Figure 3 shows the plots of the
relative humidity, SRH, and temperature sensitivities, ST,
with respect to cross-section areas of the polyimide coating, Ac,
for all fiber Bragg gratings. For low coating to fiber cross-section area
ratios, the fitted curves, which correspond to the sensitivity models (eqs. (2)
and (3)), show an almost linear dependence of SRH and ST
on Ac. The deviation from linearity is less than 4% for the coating
thicknesses used in this work. For thicker coatings, the sensitivities
eventually tend to saturate at values similar to those for bulk polyimide. As
for the bare grating, SRH = 0 K-1, whereas ST
= (6.31 ± 0.05)·10-6 K-1, which matches the temperature
sensitivity obtained via an independent calibration measurement using a
thermostatic water bath. Using the known thermal expansion coefficient of the
fiber, αf, we obtain the thermo-optic coefficient ξ (table
1). Our value is different from the values found in literature, e.g. [8], which
might be due to the dependence of ξ on wavelength, temperature and core
doping. Given the typical mechanical properties of a silica fiber, Ef
= 72 GPa [10] and αf = 0.05·10-5 K-1 [9],
the bare fiber diameter of 127 mm and the modulus of the polyimide, Ec = 2.45 GPa [11],
we may determine the thermal and hygroscopic expansion coefficients of the
polyimide. By fitting eqs. (2) and (3) based on the 1-D model to the
corresponding SRH and ST data, the expansion coefficients
become
=
8.3·10-5 %RH-1 and
=
5.5·10-5 K-1, respectively. While
is higher than the value given by the
supplier (4·10-5 K-1) [11], we could not trace any other
value of βc in the literature. With
and
used in the 3-D model, we calculated up to
16% higher sensitivities for the sensor geometries exploited in this work.
Fitting the 3-D model to the experimental sensitivities gives estimations of
=
7.4·10-5 %RH-1 and
=
4.9·10-5 K-1. Table 1 shows the material properties
determined in this work as well as reference values. We notice that the
mechanical contribution is higher for SRH than for ST;
therefore, SRH is more sensitive to coating thickness changes than ST.
Fig. 3.
Temperature and relative humidity sensitivities of fiber Bragg gratings
with different polyimide coating thicknesses.
In summary, we presented a new fiber
optic relative humidity sensor using polyimide coated fiber Bragg gratings.
Tests in a controlled climatic chamber show a linear, reversible and accurate
sensor response for temperature and relative humidity ranges from 13 to 60 °C,
and 10 to 90 %RH, respectively. We may easily compensate for the temperature
cross-sensitivity using an additional bare fiber Bragg grating, which is not
humidity sensitive. The temperature and relative humidity sensitivities depend
on the coating thickness, with the sensor becoming more sensitive with
increasing coating thickness. Using this interrelation we were able to
determine the hygroscopic and thermal expansion coefficients of the polyimide
coating. From a practical point of view, the sensor proposed here is easy to
implement, and may be readily integrated within a multipoint and -parameter
optical fiber Bragg grating sensor network thanks to its multiplexing
capabilities.
The authors would like to thank G.
Tirabassi from Rotronic AG, Switzerland, who kindly agreed to lend us a
calibrated temperature and relative humidity gauge.
Parameter
|
This Work
|
Reference
|
1-D
|
3-D
|
Fiber (silica)
|
|
|
Young's modulus, Ef [GPa]
|
-
|
72 [10]
|
Thermal exp. coeff., αf [10-5 K-1]
|
-
|
0.05 [9]
|
Hygroscopic exp. coeff., βf [%RH-1]
|
0
|
0
|
Thermo-optic coeff., x [10-5 K-1]
|
0.581
(a)
|
0.617 (b) [8]
|
Effective refractive index, neff
|
-
|
1.446 (a)
|
Pockel's coeff., p11
|
-
|
0.121 [9]
|
Pockel's coeff., p12
|
-
|
0.270 [9]
|
Coating (polyimide)
|
|
|
Young's modulus, Ec [GPa]
|
-
|
2.45 [11]
|
Thermal exp. coeff., αc [10-5 K-1]
|
5.5
|
4.9
|
4 [11]
|
Hygroscopic exp. coeff., βc [10-5 %RH-1]
|
8.3
|
7.4
|
-
|
(a) wavelength:
1550 nm; (b)
wavelength: 1310 nm
Table 1.
Fiber and coating material properties
1.
|
J. Dakin, B. Culshaw, “Optical Fiber
Sensors”, vol. 1, Artech House Optoelectronics Library, Boston (1988).
|
2.
|
F.
Mitschke, “Fibre-optic sensor for humidity”, Opt. Lett. 14 (1989), 967-969.
|
3.
|
F.J. Arregui, Y. Liu,
I.R. Matias, R.O. Claus, “Optical fiber humidity sensor using a nano
Fabry-Perot cavity formed by the ionic self-assembly method”, Sensors and
Actuators B 59 (1999), 54-59
.
|
4.
|
M.R.
Shahriari, G.H. Sigel Jr., Q. Zhou, “Porous fiber optic for a high
sensitivity humidity sensor”, Digest on Optical Fiber Sensors (1988),
OSA, Washington D.C.
|
5.
|
A.
Kharaz, B.E. Jones, “A distributed optical-fibre sensing system for
multi-point humidity measurements”, Sensors and Actuators A 46-47 (1995), 491-493.
|
6.
|
W.C.
Michie, B. Culshaw, A. McLean, M. Konstantaki, S. Hadjiloucas, “Distributed
Water Ingress and Water Potential Measurements using Fibre Optics”,
Cement and Concrete Composites 19
(1997), 35-44.
|
7.
|
Ph.
Giaccari, H.G. Limberger, P. Kronenberg, “Influence of humidity and
temperature on polyimide-coated fiber Bragg gratings”, BGPP, OSA, Stresa
(2001), BFB2.
|
8.
|
A.D.
Kersey, M.A. Davis, H.J. Patrick, M. LeBlanc, K.P. Koo, C.G. Askins, M.A.
Putnam, E.J. Friebele, “Fiber Grating Sensors”, Journal of Lightwave
Technology 15 (8) (1997),
1442-1463.
|
9.
|
G.B.
Hocker, “Fiber-optic sensing of pressure and temperature”, Applied
Optics 18 (9) (1979), 1445-1448.
|
10.
|
F.P.
Malinder, B.A. Proctor, “Elastic constants of fused silica as a function
of large tensile strain”, Physics of Chemistry of Glasses 5 (4) (1964), 91-103.
|
11.
|
Pyralin®
Product Information, HD MicroSystems (2001).
|
|
 |