6.1.4 : Influence of humidity and temperature on polyimide-coated fiber Bragg gratings (Results and discussion) Activate Navigation Menu 6.2 : Relative Humidity Sensor Using Optical Fiber Bragg Gratings

Home Page   |   Site Map   |   Contact   |   No Javascript

+

CV

+

Ph.D.

+

{ Web Version }

+

Table of Contents

+

{ Abstract / Résumé }

+

Chapter 1

+

Chapter 2

+

Chapter 3

+

Chapter 4

+

Chapter 5

+

Chapter 6

+

{ 6.1 }

+

6.1.1 and 2

+

6.1.3

+

6.1.4

+

6.1.5 and 6

+

6.2

+

Chapter 7

+

Chapter 8

+

Appendix

+

Other parts

+

Post-Doc

+

MBI

+

Physics Diploma

+

Photos

+

6.1.1 and 2 : Influence of humidity and temperature on polyimide-coated fiber Bragg gratings (Abstract, Introduction)

+

6.1.3 : Influence of humidity and temperature on polyimide-coated fiber Bragg gratings (Experiment)

+

6.1.4 : Influence of humidity and temperature on polyimide-coated fiber Bragg gratings (Results and discussion)

+

6.1.5 and 6 : Influence of humidity and temperature on polyimide-coated fiber Bragg gratings (Conclusion, References)

6.1         Influence of humidity and temperature on polyimide-coated fiber Bragg gratings

6.1.5        Conclusion

The polyimide used for FBG re-coating leads to a sensitivity of the FBG wavelength to humidity and enhances its temperature sensitivity as expected. The polyimide coated FBG shows sensitivities of 4.36×10-6 RH%-1 and 10.6×10-6 K-1. Relative humidity changes can lead to a wavelength shift of more than 0.5 nm at 1550 nm. For applications where the narrowband filter wavelength stability is essential like DWDM, less sensitive coatings or sealing have to be employed. In high temperature sensor applications, where polyimide coatings are necessary the RH cross sensitivity has to be considered.

6.1.6        References

1.

H.G. Limberger and D. Varelas, “Advances in Fiber Gratings: Technology, Applications, and Reliability.”, Proceedings of SPIE: Critical Reviews of Fiber Optic Components & Systems Reliability, vol. CR73, addendum, 1999.

2.

G. Meltz, “Overview of Fiber Grating-Based Sensors”, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 2838, pp. 2-21, 1996.

3.

A.D. Kersey, M.A. Davis, H.J. Patrick, L. M., K.P. Koo, C.G. Askins, P. M.A., and E.J. Friebele, “Fiber Grating Sensors”, Journal of Lightwave Technology 15 (8), pp. 1442-1463, 1997.

4.

J.L. Armstrong, M.J. Matthewson, and C.R. Kurkjian, “Moisture Penetration Through Optical Fiber Coatings”, International Wire & Cable Symposium, pp. 732-739, 1998.

5.

P.Kronenberg, D. Inaudi, I. F.C. Smith, “Development of an “optical hair”-hygrometer: A novel way to measure humidity using fibre optics”, Int. Conf. on trends in optical non-destructive testing, D. Inaudi, P.K. Rastogi ed., Lugano, pp. 467-474, 2000.



6.1.4 : Influence of humidity and temperature on polyimide-coated fiber Bragg gratings (Results and discussion) Activate Navigation Menu 6.2 : Relative Humidity Sensor Using Optical Fiber Bragg Gratings