Home Page   |   Site Map   |   Contact
Path :  www.lphg.ch Ph.D. { Web Version } Chapter 4 { 4.2 } 4.2.2
Previous  |  Next
CV
Table of Contents
{ Abstract / Résumé }
Chapter 1
Chapter 2
Chapter 3
4.1
4.2.1 : Overview
Ph.D.  /  { Web Version }  /  Chapter 4  /  { 4.2 }  /  4.2.2 : Temporal coherence in vacuum
MBI
Physics Diploma
Photos
Post-Doc
Chapter 5
Chapter 6
Chapter 7
Chapter 8
Appendix
Other parts
4.3
{ 4.4 }
{ 4.5 }
4.6
4.7
{ 4.2.3 : Propagation in vacuum }
4.2.4 : Propagation in dielectric materials
4.2.5 : OLCR measurement of FBG

4.2        OLCR measurement of the complex impulse response

4.2.2       Temporal coherence in vacuum

The light electric field (E) oscillation frequencies are extremely high, that is hundreds of terahertz for frequencies corresponding to a period of a few femtoseconds, and conventional detectors cannot measure directly E. For stationary fields, the time average of E is null and this explains why detectors are set to measure a time average of the square field amplitude called the intensity I as defined in equation (4-3)


(4-3)


Standard detection systems have averaging range of a few picoseconds to several nanoseconds. This averaging process of the signal intensity leads to three types of coherence functions [4-5] :

-         the temporal coherence function that represents the ability of a light source to interfere with a delayed version of itself

-         the spatial coherence function that represents the ability of a light source to interfere with a spatially shifted version of itself

-         the polarization coherence function that represents the ability of a light source to interfere with another state of polarization version of itself

Here, the spatial coherence is neglected by assuming localized light source and one-dimensional propagation. The polarization coherence function is also not considered by assuming non-polarized light and propagation preserving the polarization.

In order to theoretically describe the temporal coherence, the electric field E is represented in the orthogonal basis of frequency with a single parameter of time t


(4-4)


This is a continuous and infinite decomposition, and frequency components of E cannot interfere with each other since they are orthogonal. The intensity I(t) is then found to be


(4-5)


where S(n) is defined as the spectral power density. S(n) constant with time due to the stationary properties of the light considered in this case.

The temporal coherence effects occur when two delayed version of the same light are superposed. For this reason, we now consider two light waves with electrical field E1 and E2 defined as




(4-6)


where E1 and E2 represent two delayed versions of the same light, with source electric field signal Es and intensity Is emitted at time t and t + t. The frequency dependent phase factor f(n) is related to the emission process. The intensity I(t), given by the superposition of E1 and E2, is independent of the time due to the stationary properties of the light and is expressed as


 

(4-7)


where G(t)=<Es(t)Es*(t+t)> is the autocorrelation function of the light source also called the temporal coherence function. From equation (4-6) we can see that


(4-8)


which is the well known Wiener-Khintchine theorem, with G(t) and S(n) forming a Fourier pair. It is often more convenient to use a normalized coherence function g(t) called the degree of coherence and defined as


(4-9)


The intensity I(t) becomes


(4-10)




Top   |   JavaScript
Path :  www.lphg.ch Ph.D. { Web Version } Chapter 4 { 4.2 } 4.2.2
Previous  |  Next